Portfolio Pitch Deck — 4 Research Slides
For HKUST(GZ) Red Bird Challenge Camp. Minimal text, image-driven.
Slide 1 — THE GAP
Models know, but don’t act.
- RAG: Models detect contradictions, yet keep recommending dangerously.
- Agents: They recognize attacks early, yet execute them anyway.
- Insight: Safety is a routing problem, not just recognition.
Visual Suggestion
Split-screen image:
- Left: A glowing brain / neural network (labeled “Internal State ✓”)
- Right: A disconnected output wire or broken action arrow (labeled “External Action ✗”)
- Center: A gap / crack between them
Figures to Extract
- From Detecting Is Not Resolving: the multi-turn danger-rate chart (T2 danger 0.44–1.00)
- From Knowing Is Not Acting: the early-layer vs. late-layer causality diagram
Slide 2 — THE LENS
We look inside to see why.
- DISF (ACL 2026): Dual-path internal-state forcing constructs contrastive negative signals.
- LatentAudit (CoLM 2026): Residual-stream geometry reads faithfulness in 0.77 ms.
- Attribution Blind Spot (EMNLP): Internal-trajectory divergence exposes parametric memory.
- Insight: From guessing outputs → inspecting internals.
Visual Suggestion
Three vertical panels showing an X-ray / cross-section view of a model:
- Panel 1: Two parallel paths (CTX vs. NOCTX) — DISF
- Panel 2: A magnifying glass over residual-stream activations — LatentAudit
- Panel 3: Diverging trajectories inside the model — Attribution Blind Spot
Figures to Extract
- From DISF: Figure 1 (dual-path architecture with CTX / NOCTX)
- From LatentAudit: Figure 1 (pipeline overview: Monitor → ZK Proof)
- From Attribution Blind Spot: The with-context vs. without-context trajectory diagram
Slide 3 — THE LEVER
We intervene to fix it.
- FIDES (EMNLP): Token-selective decoding unlocks suppressed capability. 92–94% fidelity.
- CORDON-MAS (EMNLP): Architectural isolation blocks poison. ASR ↓ 92.4%.
- Whose Thoughts? (NeurIPS): Projection steering recovers lost routing. +17.3 pp.
- Insight: From passive detection → active control.
Visual Suggestion
A lever / gear mechanism transforming input to safe output:
- Left: Unsafe input entering
- Center: Three intervention gears (Token Selective / Isolation / Projection)
- Right: Safe output exiting
Figures to Extract
- From FIDES: The three-layer signal fusion diagram (Output / Hidden / Trajectory)
- From CORDON-MAS: The multi-agent architecture (Extractor → Auditor → Gate → Synthesizer)
- From Whose Thoughts?: The rank-k projection steering diagram
Slide 4 — THE HORIZON
We deploy where it matters.
- RETINA-SAFE (MICCAI): 12,522-sample benchmark for diabetic retinopathy risk triage.
- ZK-FPE: Blockchain-verifiable model ownership without exposing weights.
- Future: Multimodal mechanistic interpretability for accountable AI.
- Insight: Safe AI must be inspectable and accountable.
Visual Suggestion
Three horizon panels fading from lab to world:
- Left: A medical retina scan with heatmap overlay — RETINA-SAFE
- Center: A blockchain / shield icon with zero-knowledge circuit — ZK-FPE
- Right: A multimodal AI system (vision + language) with internal pathways lit up — Future
Figures to Extract
- From RETINA-SAFE: The E-Align / E-Conflict / E-Gap taxonomy diagram
- From ZK-FPE: The fingerprint verification flow diagram
- Concept art: Multimodal model internals (can be a simple diagram)
Navigation Bar (Optional)
Place at the top or bottom of every slide for continuity:
THE GAP → THE LENS → THE LEVER → THE HORIZON
■ □ □ □ (Slide 1)
■ ■ □ □ (Slide 2)
■ ■ ■ □ (Slide 3)
■ ■ ■ ■ (Slide 4)
Color & Typography Notes
| Element | Suggestion |
|---|---|
| Titles | All caps, bold, large (e.g., THE GAP) |
| Subtitles | Sentence case, lighter weight (e.g., Models know, but don't act.) |
| Bullets | One line each, no wrapping |
| Insight line | Italic, accent color (e.g., red or gold) |
| Background | Dark navy or clean white; let figures provide color |